Archive for the 'Afghanistan' Category



A Civil War – Not an Insurgency

Can he be won over?

It’s a grim milestone that with good leadership could have been avoided.  This week a Royal Marine wounded in Helmund Province became the 300th British service member to die as a result of operations in Afghanistan.  The tragic death has caused many Brits to pause and reflect, not only on the sacrifices made by our brave men and woman in uniform but on the broader issue of what our country can realistically achieve in Afghanistan. Continue reading ‘A Civil War – Not an Insurgency’

Not Fit to Lead

Talib in Helmand 2004

After four years, the British media have finally got it.  This week, The Times published a two month investigation into who was responsible for the disastrous decision to deploy British forces to Helmand Province, Afghanistan in insufficient numbers back in 2006. The answer was in the headline:  The Officer’s Mess.

Of course, today it is obvious to a blind man that the Helmand mission was poorly planned and woefully undermanned.  Nearly three hundred brave British soldiers have lost their lives in Southern Afghanistan and many have sustained horrific, life-altering wounds.  But as far back as 2004 and certainly by 2005, it was clear to anyone who visited the province that it would never be pacified by a token occupying force. Continue reading ‘Not Fit to Lead’

Karzai Wins Again?

Still on Top

Remember the not-so-distant past when the word ‘corruption’ peppered every official US comment on Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s government?  Yet the ‘C’ word has been conspicuously absent during Karzai’s feel good tour of Washington this week.  President Obama claimed that the ‘perceived tensions’ were ‘simply overstated’; this despite the fact that as recently as last month, Karzai reportedly told  a group of Afghan lawmakers that he should quit the political process and join the Taliban.  So why have recriminations and threats suddenly been replaced by smiles and handshakes?

It has nothing to do with cleaning up corruption, that’s for sure.  By all accounts, it’s still business as usual in Kabul and Karzai’s brother, an alleged drugs lord, is still living large in Kandahar.   In my view, the Afghan President is being given the red carpet treatment not because of the ‘C’ word but because of the ‘D’ word – deadline.

President Obama hopes to begin withdrawing US forces from Afghanistan by July 2011.  Abandoning Karzai so late in the game would undoubtedly push this deadline back; something which would not go down well with US voters at a time when Obama will be gearing up for re-election. (Unlike Britain, US campaigning starts more than a year before voters actually go to the polls).

Karzai knows this all too well and true to form, he is manipulating the situation to his advantage.  As I’ve said in previous blogs, Karzai is an astute man who can run rings around his western counterparts.  It boggles the mind how in a matter of weeks, he’s refocused the Afghan debate away from corruption and toward issues which can only bolster him back home; limiting civilian causalities and reconciling with the Taliban.

Carrot or stick, Karzai will do what is best for Karzai.  And like a hard done by political wife, Obama is so invested in the Afghan President he has no choice but to stand by his man.  But does Britain have to stand by him as well?  Don’t forget, that while Karzai is being showered with affection in Washington, an innocent and upstanding British commercial security manager, Bill Shaw languishes in a notorious Kabul jail.

Unlike President Obama, the new British Prime Minister David Cameron has just come through an election and is therefore in an outstanding position to shake up foreign policy.  I personally would like the new PM to withdraw British troops from Afghanistan immediately. I doubt that’s on the cards though, so I’ll settle for demanding Mr. Shaw’s immediate release.

Bombs, Bullets and Political Pissing Matches

Political Pawns?

Private security contractors working for Western PSCs in Kabul added another occupational hazard to their already considerable portfolio this week after Bill Shaw, a manager for Britain’s largest security firm was convicted of bribery by an Afghan court and sentenced to two years in prison.  I have no doubt that Mr. Shaw was acting in good faith when he paid a $20,000 fine for the release of two improperly licensed vehicles owned by his employer, G4S; parent company of ArmorGroup.  By all accounts, he is an upstanding manager who got caught in a political pissing match between Karzai’s government and the West over who is fuelling corruption in Afghanistan. Continue reading ‘Bombs, Bullets and Political Pissing Matches’

Running Away from Death Valley

Eastern Afghanistan's Unforgiving Terrain

I applaud General Stanley McChrystal’s decision this week to withdraw US Forces from the Korengal Valley in the notorious Kunar-Nuristan corridor of Afghanistan.  Even with roughly 150,000 troops soon at his disposal, it’s a brave call to abandon what was touted as an operationally important area—especially when the Taliban will undoubtedly claim the move as a victory.  The pullback is being billed as part of a larger ‘repositioning’ of US and NATO forces to more populated areas of Afghanistan.  Still, repositioning or not, some places cannot be dominated.

I speak from experience when I say that the Kunar-Nuristan corridor falls into that category. Continue reading ‘Running Away from Death Valley’

A Warzone – Not an Amusement Park

No fast food here either.

General Stanley McChrystal deserves a huge round of applause this week for shutting down fast food outlets on US bases in Afghanistan.  According to a blog by McChrystal’s Command Sergeant Major, closing such non-essential amenities will free up storage and transport capacity for the 30,000 additional US troops and 7,000 ISAF soldiers deploying over the coming months.  Some British newspapers have suggested that obesity among the rear echelon may also have factored into the decision.

Closing down the likes of Burger King, Pizza Hut and Dairy Queen may help with the battle of the bulge and most certainly will help accommodate the troop surge.  Still, I suspect there is a deeper agenda at play here.  Continue reading ‘A Warzone – Not an Amusement Park’

China: Making a Killing in Afghanistan

All for China?

It looks like China is poised to cash in again on Afghanistan, despite having never fired a single shot in anger there.   This week, Beijing got a step closer to developing natural gas fields in northwest Afghanistan after signing three agreements with Kabul covering economic cooperation, training and trade.  If you’ll recall, China won a major deal in 2007 to develop the Aynak copper mine outside Kabul – one of the world’s largest.   Work on the $3 billion project has reportedly gone slower than expected due to deteriorating security, leading some observers to conclude that Beijing may be reluctant to significantly increase investment in Afghanistan.   But if this week’s agreements are anything to go by, China will continue to do very well for itself in Afghanistan without having sacrificed a thing. Continue reading ‘China: Making a Killing in Afghanistan’

The Rules of Engagement v Hearts and Minds

not winning hearts and minds

This week, General Stanley McChrystal apologized to the Afghan people and personally to President Karzai after at least 27 civilians were killed by a NATO airstrike in the southern Province of Uruzgan.   To his credit, General McChrystal has taken concrete steps to limit civilian casualties in Afghanistan.  Since becoming commander of US and NATO forces, he has tightened the rules of engagement to restrict the use of artillery attacks and airstrikes.   These measures were definitely needed.  But I would like to see General McChrystal go even further. 

A Pivotal Week for Afghanistan?

War Weary in Helmund

The past week has witnessed two actions billed as possible turning points for the war in Afghanistan:  the launch of Operation Moshtarak in Helmund and the capture of Mullah Baradar, the top military commander of Mullah Omar’s Taliban.   Could either event be a potential game changer?

     The capture of Mullah Baradar is significant, especially if it leads to the arrest of Mullah Omar and/or more of his top tier commanders.  But I doubt whether taking Mullah Baradar out of action will make a drastic difference at ground level in Afghanistan.  After all, Mullah Omar’s Taliban is just one insurgent group fighting the coalition.  Mullah Baradar’s arrest is unlikely to curtail the operations of the Haqqani network (which many consider the most capable militant group in Afghanistan at present) or Gulbuddin Hekmatyar’s Hizb-i-Islami. Continue reading ‘A Pivotal Week for Afghanistan?’

Attack On Kabul: An Ominous Sign

ANP Checkpoint Outside Kabul

Coalition commanders were full of praise for Afghanistan’s security forces after Taliban gunmen and suicide bombers assaulted buildings in the heart of Kabul Monday.  General Stanley McChrystal, the head of NATO and US forces in Afghanistan, said the Afghan national forces should be ‘commended’ for dealing ‘effectively’ with the attack. US Brigadier General Anne Macdonald claimed the Afghan forces responded ‘very well’ while an ISAF spokesperson gushed that they had ‘rapidly’ seized the initiative.

            Don’t be blinded by the spin.  Effective security is not about responding to an attack; it’s about being proactive and preventing one from happening in the first place.    Continue reading ‘Attack On Kabul: An Ominous Sign’

« Previous PageNext Page »



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 134 other followers